Name | Modified | Size |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bin | ||
docs | ||
features | ||
lib | ||
resources | ||
spec | ||
appveyor.yml | 9 years ago | |
CHANGELOG.md | 9 years ago | |
Gemfile | 9 years ago | |
LICENSE | 9 years ago | |
MAINTAINERS.md | 9 years ago | |
omnibus.gemspec | 9 years ago | |
Rakefile | 9 years ago | |
README.md | 9 years ago | |
.gitignore | 9 years ago | |
.rubocop.yml | 9 years ago | |
.travis.yml | 9 years ago |
Change | User | Description | Committed |
---|---|---|---|
18235 | tjuricek | Remove old omnibus packaging logic. | 9 years ago |
17082 | tjuricek | The debian packages need the ~dist tag as part of the iteration value in the control file. | 9 years ago |
17069 | tjuricek | Converting naming again to what we actually use, instead of what we documented. Package... names and versions should use _ delims Build iteration and dist_tag should use ~ delim dist tag and arch should use _ delim « |
9 years ago |
17068 | tjuricek | Apparently, unless the dist tag starts with a period, the RPM build fails. | 9 years ago |
17064 | tjuricek | Correcting file naming schemes use hyphens and supported platform names. Also, moving '...distribution ID' to from the 'build iteration' hack to the .deb logic where it actually works better. « |
9 years ago |
17063 | tjuricek | Basically, don't rename 'x86_64' to 'amd64' for the platform name in .deb files. | 9 years ago |
17058 | tjuricek | Alter omnibus build to meet our current naming conventions. The strange bit here is tha...t the 'build_iteration' includes the architecture name on debian, but on rpms, we generate it in the omnibus level. This may confuse people. See also: https://confluence.perforce.com:8443/display/IP/Package+Naming+Approach#PackageNamingApproach-LinuxPackageNamingApproach « |
9 years ago |
17056 | tjuricek | Add omnibus branch to HWS, in order to meet internal build conventions. | 9 years ago |