8 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 22463 for main Fixed a bug with logging enhancements in @19223. Changed default value for $sameName to 1, indicating job names should match issue names from the d...efect tracking system, as that is the preferred and most commonly used setting. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
Add a comment | ||
8 years agoC. Thomas Tyler committed change 22462 into main Fixed a bug with logging enhancements in @19223. Changed default value for $sameName to 1, indicating job names should match issue names from the d...efect tracking system, as that is the preferred and most commonly used setting. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 19244 for main Rolled back this change per review commentsr. See: https://swarm.workshop.perforce.com/changes/19225 This can still be a good change in some... environments, but may not be a good default due to configurability of JIRA workflows. #review @karl_wirth @joel_brown « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler committed change 19243 into main Rolled back this change per review commentsr. See: https://swarm.workshop.perforce.com/changes/19225 This can still be a good change in some... environments, but may not be a good default due to configurability of JIRA workflows. #review @karl_wirth @joel_brown « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler rejected review 19226 for main Backing out this change per comments form Karl and Joel. | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler commented on review 19226 for main Thanks for the feedback! I'll back out this change. | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler approved review 19224 for main Karl gave this a +1; approving. | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler approved review 19222 for main Karl gave this a +1, approving. | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler archived review 18828 for main | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler archived review 18825 for main | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler archived review 18822 for main | ||
9 years agoKarl Wirth voted up review 19222 for main Removed the 'host:' prefix of the sample P4PORT value, to promote the best pratice of using purely numeric P4PORT value for trigger and broker script...s. There's never reason for a server-side trigger (or broker) script to specify the optional 'host:' portion of a P4PORT value, and in fact doing so can be dangerous. Having a hard-coded 'host:' field makes it all too easy for testing of triggers on a development server to interact unwitingly with the live production server. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoKarl Wirth voted up review 19224 for main Logging enhancement: If LOGS environment varialbe is defined, store the log file in that directory. This makes P4DTG work work in an SDP envi...ronment, but without introducing any dependency on the SDP. The SDP defines LOGS in the shell environment before starting the p4d server process, thus making it available to all trigger scripts. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoKarl Wirth commented on review 19226 for main Agree. Jira workflows are too configurable. We still recommend that you update a custom field called 'P4Status' (for example) then let a JIRA trigger ...Agree. Jira workflows are too configurable. We still recommend that you update a custom field called 'P4Status' (for example) then let a JIRA trigger decide if that's a valid state change. The alternative would be to write an API request that checks if the state change were valid before trying to replicate it (if possible), but that has scaling and maintenance issues. « | ||
9 years agoJoel Brown commented on review 19226 for main Prefer not. Fine for bugzilla. For JIRA, we strongly advise NOT to mirror status so no need to change. Note that this setting has no affect on ...Prefer not. Fine for bugzilla. For JIRA, we strongly advise NOT to mirror status so no need to change. Note that this setting has no affect on jobs status changes via a fix with a submit. « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler committed change 19227 into main Updated copyright year. No functional change. | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 19226 for main | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler committed change 19225 into main | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 19224 for main Logging enhancement: If LOGS environment varialbe is defined, store the log file in that directory. This makes P4DTG work work in an SDP envi...ronment, but without introducing any dependency on the SDP. The SDP defines LOGS in the shell environment before starting the p4d server process, thus making it available to all trigger scripts. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler committed change 19223 into main Logging enhancement: If LOGS environment varialbe is defined, store the log file in that directory. This makes P4DTG work work in an SDP envi...ronment, but without introducing any dependency on the SDP. The SDP defines LOGS in the shell environment before starting the p4d server process, thus making it available to all trigger scripts. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 19222 for main Removed the 'host:' prefix of the sample P4PORT value, to promote the best pratice of using purely numeric P4PORT value for trigger and broker script...s. There's never reason for a server-side trigger (or broker) script to specify the optional 'host:' portion of a P4PORT value, and in fact doing so can be dangerous. Having a hard-coded 'host:' field makes it all too easy for testing of triggers on a development server to interact unwitingly with the live production server. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler committed change 19221 into main Removed the 'host:' prefix of the sample P4PORT value, to promote the best pratice of using purely numeric P4PORT value for trigger and broker script...s. There's never reason for a server-side trigger (or broker) script to specify the optional 'host:' portion of a P4PORT value, and in fact doing so can be dangerous. Having a hard-coded 'host:' field makes it all too easy for testing of triggers on a development server to interact unwitingly with the live production server. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler approved review 18822 for main Removed the 'host:' prefix of the sample P4PORT value, to promote the best pratice of using purely numeric P4PORT value for trigger and broker scrip...ts. There's never reason for a server-side trigger (or broker) script to specify the optional 'host:' portion of a P4PORT value, and in fact doing so can be dangerous. Having a hard-coded 'host:' field makes it all too easy for testing of triggers on a development server to interact with the live production server. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 18828 for main | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 18825 for main Logging enhancement: If LOGS environment varialbe is defined, store the log file in that directory. This makes P4DTG work work in an SDP envi...ronment, but without introducing any dependency on the SDP. The SDP defines LOGS in the p4d before starting the server, thus making it available to all server-side triggers. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
9 years agoC. Thomas Tyler requested review 18822 for main Removed the 'host:' prefix of the sample P4PORT value, to promote the best pratice of using purely numeric P4PORT value for trigger and broker script...s. There's never reason for a server-side trigger (or broker) script to specify the optional 'host:' portion of a P4PORT value, and in fact doing so can be dangerous. Having a hard-coded 'host:' field makes it all too easy for testing of triggers on a development server to interact with the live production server. #review @karl_wirth « | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 12396 (changeid.pl, line 47) for main Fair enough. | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 12396 for main New versions of changed.pl and README.txt with proper newlines have been pushed. That note in the README is fine. I'll clean it up, but it's from the ...New versions of changed.pl and README.txt with proper newlines have been pushed. That note in the README is fine. I'll clean it up, but it's from the days when you had send us your first born to get access to the SDK. « | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 12396 (changeid.pl, line 47) for main This script is a trigger used to enforce some behavior in Perforce that Bugzilla requires. I don't think it's for transitioning. | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 12396 (changeid.pl, line 47) for main Since this is a script to allow a system previously using P4DTI to more easily transition to P4DTG, shouldn't the $p4authuser be set to the user that ...Since this is a script to allow a system previously using P4DTI to more easily transition to P4DTG, shouldn't the $p4authuser be set to the user that P4DTI used? | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 12396 for main That's.... interesting. Considering I did it all on a Mac I'm not sure where the \r\n's could have come from. I'll resubmit with the line endings clea ...That's.... interesting. Considering I did it all on a Mac I'm not sure where the \r\n's could have come from. I'll resubmit with the line endings cleaned up. « | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 12396 (changeid.pl, line 1) for main Ditto for the changeid.pl script on the line ending comment made for README.txt. | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 12396 (README.txt, line 1) for main The diff is showing line ending differences. The diff is showing line ending differences. | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 12396 (README, line 6) for main Should this statement be of concern given this has been released to workshop? | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 12396 for main Just a heads up for those following; P4DTG-SDK has been updated with the code for the JIRA REST API. Apologies for the delay. | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main Sorry for that. It's live now. You can download the whole kit and caboodle here: https://swarm.workshop.perforce.com/projects/perforce-software-p4dtg- ...Sorry for that. It's live now. You can download the whole kit and caboodle here: https://swarm.workshop.perforce.com/projects/perforce-software-p4dtg-sdk « | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 8981 for main Hi Matt, A gentle ping... | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main Most definitely. I'll work to get it out this week; sorry for the delay. | ||
10 years agoBruce McPeek commented on change 8981 for main Hi Matt, | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main Completely agree. There's a lot of polish work we need to do for these projects; thankfully we have another set of hands joining us soon. I'll put the ...Completely agree. There's a lot of polish work we need to do for these projects; thankfully we have another set of hands joining us soon. I'll put these in our backlog. « | ||
10 years agomarct22 commented on change 8981 for main can we also have a distro directory in https://swarm.workshop.perforce.com/files/guest/perforce_software/p4dtg-sdk that has the last bundled installer ...can we also have a distro directory in https://swarm.workshop.perforce.com/files/guest/perforce_software/p4dtg-sdk that has the last bundled installer (perhaps with some kind of version number or patch version) and a tgz or zip of the source code that made that particular installer? THen maybe have a way to tell people where to download the installer at if they are looking at the P4DtG-SDK project in the 'Overview -> about' « | ||
10 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main The REST version will be available in November. I'll make sure that the Workshop is promptly updated at the same time. | ||
11 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main Sorry for the slow response; I need to check with the dev team to see if the REST version is ready to publish. It should below; when were putting the ...Sorry for the slow response; I need to check with the dev team to see if the REST version is ready to publish. It should below; when were putting the finishing touches on it when I first pushed the DTG code. I'll check up and let you know! « | ||
11 years agomarct22 commented on change 8981 for main I am looking at p4dtg and jira 6.x. The docs say to enable RPC-Jira, but that plugin is deprecated. I'm having problems just finding that plugin. At ...I am looking at p4dtg and jira 6.x. The docs say to enable RPC-Jira, but that plugin is deprecated. I'm having problems just finding that plugin. Atlassian says they are moving from SOAP to REST. Is there plans to switch to REST? https://developer.atlassian.com/display/JIRADEV/SOAP+and+XML-RPC+API+Deprecated+in+JIRA+6.0 « | ||
11 years agorsmith commented on change 8981 for main Just to confirm, our Corporate firewall was blocking the outbound connection for port 1666. Sorry for the confusion. | ||
11 years agorsmith commented on change 8981 for main yeah, I'm def behind the corp mosquito net. I can't reach public.perforce.com on 1666 either. yeah, I'm def behind the corp mosquito net. I can't reach public.perforce.com on 1666 either. | ||
11 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main I've also added a rule to properly handle those wiki links; I rejiggered some rewrite rules last week and I accidentally broke the old wiki links. Tha ...I've also added a rule to properly handle those wiki links; I rejiggered some rewrite rules last week and I accidentally broke the old wiki links. Thanks for letting me know. « | ||
11 years agoMatt Attaway commented on change 8981 for main I just double checked and the Workshop server appears to be up and happy. Are you connecting from behind a corporate firewall? I've seen a couple case ...I just double checked and the Workshop server appears to be up and happy. Are you connecting from behind a corporate firewall? I've seen a couple cases now where firewalls have prevented people from accessing the Workshop p4d. « | ||
11 years agoLiz Lam commented on change 8981 for main public.perforce.com:1666 should work. | ||
11 years agorsmith commented on change 8981 for main How can I grab the code with a p4 client without having to use a browser file-by-file? workshop.perforce.com:1666 always responds with connection refu ...How can I grab the code with a p4 client without having to use a browser file-by-file? workshop.perforce.com:1666 always responds with connection refused. The only place I've found that references how to connect is :http://wiki.workshop.perforce.com/wiki/How_to_Browse. The link sent in the email validation response is dead: http://public.perforce.com/wiki/How_to_Contribute « | ||